{"id":2188,"date":"2025-10-28T16:41:15","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T20:41:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T16:41:15","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T20:41:15","slug":"droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

Lorsque la plainte reproche au professionnel d\u2019avoir fait d\u00e9faut de respecter les r\u00e8gles de l\u2019art, le syndic doit pr\u00e9senter une preuve d\u2019expert devant le conseil de discipline. Ce principe \u00e9nonc\u00e9 par le Tribunal des professions est d\u00e9sormais bien connu en droit disciplinaire.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mais les \u00ab r\u00e8gles de l\u2019art \u00bb, c\u2019est quoi au juste ? D\u2019o\u00f9 proviennent-elles ? Qui peut agir comme expert ? Quand faire appel \u00e0 un expert ? Comment le rapport d\u2019expertise doit-il \u00eatre r\u00e9dig\u00e9 ? Enfin, pourquoi recourir \u00e0 l\u2019expertise ?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Voici nos r\u00e9ponses \u00e0 ces 6 questions concernant l\u2019expertise en droit disciplinaire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quoi ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Les \u00ab r\u00e8gles de l\u2019art \u00bb, ou les normes ou principes scientifiques g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement reconnus dans la profession, sont des r\u00e8gles \u00e0 laquelle tous les membres d\u2019un ordre doivent se conformer.[2]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

La norme doit faire l\u2019objet d\u2019un consensus dans la communaut\u00e9 scientifique[3]<\/a> et \u00eatre celle qui s\u2019appliquait au moment du manquement reproch\u00e9[4]<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

O\u00f9 ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Une norme ne se restreint pas n\u00e9cessairement au territoire qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois.[5]<\/a> Autrement dit, il est possible que la norme appliqu\u00e9e au Qu\u00e9bec s\u2019applique \u00e9galement ailleurs au Canada, voire ailleurs dans le monde. Cela dit, lorsque la norme qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise diff\u00e8re de celle qui est appliqu\u00e9e ailleurs, c\u2019est celle du Qu\u00e9bec qui doit \u00eatre respect\u00e9e.[6]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

La norme peut notamment \u00eatre prouv\u00e9e par la litt\u00e9rature scientifique sur le sujet[7]<\/a> ou par ce qui est enseign\u00e9 aux futurs professionnels.[8]<\/a> Les guides adopt\u00e9s par un ordre, sans pour autant avoir une valeur normative ou contraignante[9]<\/a>, peuvent \u00e9galement constituer des r\u00e9f\u00e9rences d\u00e9ontologiques.[10]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Qui ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Un expert est celui qui \u00ab a acquis des connaissances sp\u00e9ciales ou particuli\u00e8res gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 des \u00e9tudes ou \u00e0 une exp\u00e9rience relatives aux questions vis\u00e9es dans son t\u00e9moignage \u00bb.[11]<\/a> Son opinion doit \u00eatre ind\u00e9pendante, impartiale et exempte de parti pris.[12]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quand ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Le syndic joue un double r\u00f4le : celui d\u2019enqu\u00eateur et celui de plaignant devant le conseil de discipline.[13]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Durant son enqu\u00eate, il a le droit de s\u2019adjoindre un expert pour l\u2019assister dans ses fonctions.[14]<\/a> Toutefois, la d\u00e9cision de porter plainte ou non rel\u00e8ve du syndic seulement.[15]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Si le syndic d\u00e9cide de porter plainte, l\u2019expert dont il a retenu les services pourra alors agir \u00e0 titre de t\u00e9moin-expert dans le cadre de l\u2019audience devant le conseil de discipline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pour remettre en question l\u2019application de la norme, le professionnel devra lui aussi pr\u00e9senter une preuve d\u2019expert.[16]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Comment ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Le rapport d\u2019expert doit respecter certaines exigences. Il doit notamment \u00eatre bref, mais suffisamment d\u00e9taill\u00e9 et motiv\u00e9.[17]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lorsqu\u2019un manquement aux r\u00e8gles de l\u2019art est all\u00e9gu\u00e9, on peut g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement s\u2019attendre \u00e0 ce que le rapport contienne\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. L\u2019identification de la norme applicable au moment des faits ;<\/span><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. L\u2019analyse des gestes pos\u00e9s par le professionnel au regard de la norme applicable ;<\/span><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Le raisonnement qui aidera le conseil de discipline \u00e0 d\u00e9terminer si les gestes pos\u00e9s constituent ou non un \u00e9cart marqu\u00e9 par rapport \u00e0 la norme.[18]<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Vu leur obligation de pr\u00e9senter une preuve d\u2019expertise fiable, claire, compr\u00e9hensible et pertinente, les avocats des parties peuvent contribuer dans une certaine mesure \u00e0 la forme et au contenu du rapport, pour autant qu\u2019il n\u2019y ait aucune interf\u00e9rence avec les devoirs d\u2019ind\u00e9pendance et d\u2019objectivit\u00e9 de l\u2019expert.[19]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Sauf exception, les projets de rapports d\u2019expert n\u2019ont pas \u00e0 \u00eatre communiqu\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019autre partie[20]<\/a>, notamment vu le privil\u00e8ge relatif au litige et le droit au secret professionnel dont b\u00e9n\u00e9ficient tant le professionnel que le syndic.[21]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Pourquoi ?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    En droit disciplinaire, il peut arriver qu\u2019une preuve d\u2019expert soit pertinente ou n\u00e9cessaire, m\u00eame lorsque ce n\u2019est pas un manquement aux r\u00e8gles de l\u2019art \u00e0 proprement dit qui soit reproch\u00e9 au professionnel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    En voici trois exemples dans la jurisprudence des derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es :<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. Dans un contexte o\u00f9 le syndic demandait la radiation provisoire imm\u00e9diate d\u2019un m\u00e9decin, celui-ci aurait d\u00fb pouvoir pr\u00e9senter une preuve d\u2019expert pour d\u00e9montrer l\u2019urgence m\u00e9dicale au moment des gestes qui lui \u00e9taient reproch\u00e9s ; [22]<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Le syndic a eu recours \u00e0 une preuve d\u2019expert pour d\u00e9montrer que certaines publications d\u2019un chimiste, notamment sur Facebook, contenaient des affirmations qui \u00e9taient contraires \u00e0 la litt\u00e9rature scientifique ; [23]<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. M\u00eame si les renseignements port\u00e9s par l\u2019audioproth\u00e9siste \u00e0 ses dossiers-clients \u00e9taient effectivement minimalistes, fragmentaires et souvent illisibles, le syndic aurait d\u00fb \u00e9tablir par preuve d\u2019expert la norme applicable \u00e0 la tenue des dossiers des audioproth\u00e9sistes. [24]<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      Pour toute autre question en lien avec la preuve d\u2019expert en droit disciplinaire, n\u2019h\u00e9sitez pas \u00e0 communiquer avec notre \u00e9quipe.<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n\n\n\n

      [1]<\/a> Dup\u00e9r\u00e9-Vanier c. Camirand-Duff<\/em>, 2001 QCTP 8<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [2]<\/a> Gruszczynski c. Avocats (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2016 QCTP 143<\/a>, par. 56.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [3]<\/a> Bisson c. Lapointe<\/em>, 2016 QCCA 1078<\/a>, par. 59 et 60<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [4]<\/a> Gonshor c. Morin, \u00e8s qualit\u00e9s (dentiste)<\/em>, 2001 QCTP 32<\/a>, par. 32.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [5]<\/a> Breger c. M\u00e9decins (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2019 QCTP 106<\/a>, par. 23.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [6]<\/a> Laplante c. Audioproth\u00e9sistes (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2024 QCTP 36<\/a>, par. 34-35.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [7]<\/a> Dup\u00e9r\u00e9-Vanier<\/em>, supra<\/em>, note 1, par. 32.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [8]<\/a> Bisson c. Lapointe<\/em>, supra<\/em>, note 3, par. 58 ; Malo c. Ordre des infirmi\u00e8res et infirmiers du Qu\u00e9bec,<\/em> 2003 QCTP 132<\/a>, par. 18.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [9]<\/a> M\u00e9decins (Ordre professionnel des) c. Garber<\/em>, 2012 QCTP 48<\/a>, par. 24 ; Allard c. Comptables professionnels agr\u00e9\u00e9s (Ordre des)<\/em>, 2020 QCTP 36<\/a>, par. 29 \u00e0 37 (requ\u00eate en r\u00e9vision judiciaire rejet\u00e9e : 2021 QCCS 4679 <\/a>; requ\u00eate pour permission d\u2019appeler rejet\u00e9e : 2022 QCCA 113<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [10]<\/a> Belhumeur c. Ergoth\u00e9rapeutes (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2011 QCTP 19<\/a>, par. 28 (requ\u00eate en r\u00e9vision judiciaire rejet\u00e9e dans 2012 QCCS 1359<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [11]<\/a> R. c. Mohan<\/em>, [1994] 2 RCS 9<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [12]<\/a> White Burgess Langille Inman c. Abbott and Haliburton Co<\/em>., [2015] 2 RCS 182<\/a>, par. 32.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [13]<\/a> Pharmascience inc. c. Binet<\/em>, [2006] 2 RCS 513<\/a>, par. 37 ; Code des professions<\/em>, RLRQ c C-26<\/a>, art. 122 et 128.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [14]<\/a> Code des professions<\/em>, supra<\/em>, note 12, art. 121.2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [15]<\/a> Ordre des ing\u00e9nieurs du Qu\u00e9bec c. Gilbert<\/em>, 2016 QCCA 1323<\/a>, par. 38.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [16]<\/a> Larouche c. Travailleurs sociaux et th\u00e9rapeutes conjugaux et familiaux du Qu\u00e9bec (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2021 QCTP 30<\/a>, par. 93 \u00e0 95.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [17]<\/a> Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/em>, RLRQ c C-25.01<\/a>, art. 238.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [18]<\/a> Voir le fardeau de preuve r\u00e9sum\u00e9 dans Gonshor, supra<\/em>, note 3, par. 48.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [19]<\/a> Moore v. Getahun<\/em>, 2015 ONCA 55<\/a>, par. 57 ; The Advocates\u2019 Society: Principles Governing Communications with Testifying Experts<\/a> (June 2014).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [20]<\/a> Moore v. Getahun<\/em>, supra<\/em>, note 18, par. 71 ; Th\u00e9baud c. R<\/em>., 2019 QCCA 724<\/a>, par. 28 ; Poulin c. Prat<\/em>, 1994 CanLII 5421 (QC CA)<\/a>, par. 29.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [21]<\/a> Blank c. Canada (Ministre de la Justice)<\/em>, [2006] 2 RCS 319<\/a>, par. 45 ; Tremblay c. Mpantis<\/em>, 2023 QCCA 345<\/a>, par. 52 \u00e0 63.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [22]<\/a> Climan c. M\u00e9decins (Ordre professionnel des)<\/em>, 2024 QCTP 5<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [23]<\/a> Chimistes (Ordre professionnel des) c. Linard<\/em>, 2023 QCCDCHIM 3<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      [24]<\/a> Audioproth\u00e9sistes (Ordre professionnel des) c. Laplante<\/em>, 2017 CanLII 50535 (QC OAPQ)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":1429,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"1635,1595,1471,1280,1311,1026","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3,43],"tags":[44,45,46],"pillar_categories":[],"class_list":["post-2188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-droit-professionnel","tag-expert","tag-expertise","tag-normes"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDroit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lanctot Avocats\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T20:41:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/03\/la-img-entete-accueil-1024x515.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"515\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions","og_url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/","og_site_name":"Lanctot Avocats","article_published_time":"2025-10-28T20:41:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":515,"url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/03\/la-img-entete-accueil-1024x515.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/"},"author":{"name":"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3bc95faebc45dc404fa383904eadd893"},"headline":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions","datePublished":"2025-10-28T20:41:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/"},"wordCount":1102,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pexels-pixabay-159832.jpg","keywords":["expert","expertise","normes"],"articleSection":["News","Droit professionnel"],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/","name":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pexels-pixabay-159832.jpg","datePublished":"2025-10-28T20:41:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pexels-pixabay-159832.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pexels-pixabay-159832.jpg","width":2500,"height":1667},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/droit-disciplinaire-lexpertise-en-6-questions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Droit disciplinaire\u00a0: L\u2019expertise en 6 questions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/","name":"Lanctot Avocats","description":"La rigueur d'un grand cabinet. L'agilit\u00e9 d'un alli\u00e9","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#organization","name":"Lanctot Avocats","url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/04\/android-chrome-512x512-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/app\/uploads\/2023\/04\/android-chrome-512x512-1.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Lanctot Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3bc95faebc45dc404fa383904eadd893","name":"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/879f9478677008db57d3d5c8dd75bb66c230a90354babaa0b0b61875a1e795ba?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/879f9478677008db57d3d5c8dd75bb66c230a90354babaa0b0b61875a1e795ba?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/879f9478677008db57d3d5c8dd75bb66c230a90354babaa0b0b61875a1e795ba?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Abigaelle Allard-Robitaille"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2188\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2188"},{"taxonomy":"pillar_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lanctotavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pillar_categories?post=2188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}